Monday, May 10, 2010
Voki
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
Information literacy/Critical literacy
From the curriculum framework (1998)
"Students recognise when and what information is needed, locate and obtain it from a range of sources and evaluate, use and share it with others".
In respect to the concept that a person needs a baseline of information in order to evaluate the authenticity or accuracy of material, I do not think it is that simple. Instead, in many instances it would be better to teach students which sites can be trusted. A great activity would be to get students to find examples of good 'accurate' information and information that is dubious, then get the children to work out for themselves how to make sound judgements and develop a "ready reckoner". I suggest a sample topic could be "which manufacturer of cars is better, Holden or Ford?". Of course, the students will go to all sorts of sites bagging each...but then they will also discover sites that give accurate objective information and statistics.
In Uni we learn about cochrane reviews, peer reviewed journal articles, and the tier system for ranking research, statistical significance co-efficients etc ( I am rusty....can't quite recall the terminology). What is the benchmark for "how accurate is accurate" for primary school children? Provided that it is not an outright lie or miss truth, is the information ok?
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
On the place of print literacy;text speak;hypertext literacy; chat and microblogging
Print literacy will always have a place, however I expect will become less common for things like newspapers.
If digital advertising replaced the junk mail, that would be a blessing. An interesting posting on the topic can be found at http://www.redant.co.uk/community/blogs/print-in-the-digital-era/
And another that looks at encouraging a love of reading in the digital era http://conferences.alia.org.au/alia2004/pdfs/ocallaghan.s.paper.pdf
Netspeak and Textspeak: Txting teh Gr8 DB8
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texting_the_great_debate David Crystal is quoted
"Typically, less than 10% of the words are abbreviated in text messages.
Abbreviating is not a new language; instead, it has been present for many decades.
Children and adults both use text language, the latter being more likely to do so.
Students do not habitually use abbreviations in their homework or examinations.
Texting is not a cause of bad spelling because people need to know how to spell before they can text.
Texting improves people's literacy, as it provides more opportunity for people to engage with the language through reading and writing. "
I think ability to use text speak interchangeably with SAE is a sign of intelligence. Many professions develop their own shorthand and jargon; Universities, the Defences, are form my observation the greatest generators and users of acronyms.
As a teacher, it is important to teach critical literacy and the appropriateness of when and where text speak should be used. It is not appropriate in CV's, professional reports, or formal letters, it is appropriate in SMS, MSN to friends. Having been a POS, PIR, POS I think teachers could also educate parents on the meanings of what their kids are writing by advising of some good translation websites.
Use of Chat/Instant Messaging in the classroom. Use of these things, provided that they are used as tools to enhance learning are powerful tools to motivate student learning. Students can chat to students in other parts of the world. This would be suitable to mid to upper primary classes. NSW has developed guidelines.
Instant messaging and facebook, seems that to date, does not need to be taught! Kids have been picking the skills up in their own time. Likewise I am not an advocate of facebook in the school environment. Certainly instant messaging when responding or replying to comments in a collaborative learning project such as blogs, and wikis is appropriate - again, it needs to linked to learning outcomes and have structure.
The notion of continuous partial attention syndrome being a product of new technology is a reality of the world we live in. The Y generation is all about connectivity and relationships.... less priority on productivity. I think this topic would be a lively debate for a Year 7 class.
Microblogging. Students should have the opportunity to learn effective use of microblogging, things like twitter are a fantastic way to readily share information and thereby increase exposure to new material - everyone can share the same learning journey. Gone are the days when students relied on a few books in the library to base their project on. Setting up parameters is important e.g. every student to find two references not older than 5 years and text to the others in their group.
Sunday, March 21, 2010
The Wiki Blog?
I see advantages of using Wikis over blogs - the class can be much more targeted in their problem solving/research; the collective knowledge of the group determines what is accepted as new knowledge as it is discovered and constructed; students learn from others where to source the best information - there is no hiding of references etc as happens when classes do individual assignments; there is an in-built mechanism for watching how the students are learning due to the versioning capability of the wiki - allowing for great self/group reflection on learning.
For a good summary, see http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI7004.pdf
There was a good article on the use of a public wiki in a German Speaking School Community, using the wiki of Sursee, and involved 100 students studying Greek mythology. Students were so enthusiastic, they continued the project after it had finished and the teacher had difficulty keeping up with the reading! The article also discusses barriers to using wikis, not least of which is teachers who lack ICT skills and fear being creative. I think public wikis, such as the one described reduces the need for duplication of teaching resources and "reinventing the wheel".
Just when I felt excited about Wikis, I decided to search the wiki of Sursee, but Sursee is a district in Switzerland. What I did find was a wiki for spelling , this site initially looked great, but upon closer scrutiny, it was like a a blog of dumped teaching material and I could not find any student interaction/ discussion. The history pages were the previous week's spelling list an only the teacher was posting to the site. I guess it served a purpose but struck me as underutilizing the capability of the wiki.
I had planned to say that wikis are better than Blogs, because Blogs tend to be less direct and represent the individual viewpoint. (Opps, now I learn it is in the hands of the person setting up the wiki!). But generally speaking, blogs with individual viewpoints are good if you want students to be reflective about their learning, but still have the ability to share content and feed off each other's ideas.
As a teacher, I would hope each of the different technologies that we are learning about has a place in the classroom, then when devising lesson plans, it will be a matter of balance and not restricting oneself to one form throughout the school year. I guess it is like different genres in literacy - a newspaper article vs a novel, vs a magazine article, vs a comic strip, vs a poem . With ICT we have email vs blog vs twitter vs wiki. I wonder if the term "genre" can be applied to different IT learning technologies? Or is there a better term to use?
Saturday, March 13, 2010
Accessibility for all - introducing Universal Access Resource Page
Since the 1980s, as an Occupational Therapist working in vocational rehabilitation I have witnessed how home computers and access to the internet has expanded the range of vocational and recreational options available for people who have severe disabilities, such as quadriplegia. My first exposure to the Internet was during a home visit with a lady suffering from MS. She had overcome her social isolation by being linked to the outside world via the Internet, at that stage it was only Web 1.0, supported by the email.
Schools need to be aware of the The Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) which was amended in 2005 to include Educational Standards , it is a legal requirment to provide equitable access to to all students unless to do so causes unjustifiable hardship.
Teachers in metropolitan WA would normally have access to health professionals (such as Speech Pathologists, Occupational Therapists) who provide advice for students with a disability where the disabilty affects ability to write, read, or use a computer. However I am interested in investigating further and capturing my findings by deveoping a "Universal Access Resource Page" on my blog - see the top left hand corner.
It is one thing to provide access to the all students, (which may mean the student with a disabiilty uses a different input device, or has specific software installed), it is another thing to integrate this student into a collaborative on-line learning experience with his/her peers. The teacher needs to ensure that what all students write or produce is compatible to devices/software that the studentwith the disability may be using. For example:-
A person who is colour blind may have difficulty seeing reds and green , so it is best to avoid titles and text in these colours. NB there are other types of colour blindness!
A person who has low vision may need to use a page reader, and other students will need to ensure that subtitles are used to describe pictures or graphics on their blogs.
A student with a different low vision problem may be able to distinguish between black and white and be able to decipher simple graphics, but not discern a picture presented as a photograph.
To assist with having uniformity on what is an acceptable standard in web page design, accessibility guidelines have been developed by W3C (W3C is short for World Wide Web Consortium, which has a mission to make the web accessible to all).
Personally, I still find it all mind boggling - and I have had some exposure to this topic over many years, so don't be worried if this feels like another quantum leap being demanded of your thinking!
A social constructivist approach when teaching children means that the teacher sets the scene for children to solve problems and find out answeres for themselves, relying on their social interaction and learning from each other. The main advantage is that children take responsibility for their own learning and it is more experiential, therefore they are more likley to remember what they find out, as opposed to being spoon fed all the information.
The disadvantage is that it can be more time consuming, requires children to have good interpersonal skills and communicate well with each other. Children with commicaiton difficulties, such as deafness can potentially be at a disadvantage. Without having explicit instruction on the scope of what they are to do, and if there is insufficient monitoring and supervision by the teacher, potentially children may go off in tangents.
Monday, March 8, 2010
Master of Primary Teaching at UWA
As part of a Unit in Learning Technologies in Education at The University of Western Australia (which I am doing in the Masters of Primary Teaching) I am required to develop my own blog.
Being middle-aged, I am appreciating how education has changed immensely from when I went to school! Harnessing new technologies is one way that teaching can be made much more exciting.
So, come and join me in my journey!
